Important Passive Design Lessons Learned from my Many Trips to Bali

Beach-facing façade of La Lucciola Restaurant. 


La Lucciola Restaurant in Bali: A perfect example of 100% passive or “no-tech” green architecture


In 2015, my husband and I dined in an amazing standalone Mediterranean restaurant, La Lucciola. Located at Jalan Kayu Ara along Petitenget Beach in Seminyak, Bali, La Lucciola had taken my romantic dining experience to the next level. Its food and services were awesome of course, but what I am more interested to share here is about its architecture.

The restaurant is the perfect example of a climate-responsive and 100% passive architecture. This type of architecture is coined as “no-tech” or “low-tech” green architecture. It demonstrates that producing green architecture without using any latest technology or active systems is not impossible. It is usually practised in remote locations where sources of materials and services are rare.

But La Lucciola is located in a busy district of Seminyak. Yet, it is made of natural materials, simple and affordable. This wooden structure with a thatched roof is sourced locally and constructed by the local people. It uses natural forces in a passive way to provide a stable comfortable environment. Overall, the building requires little maintenance.


The restaurant celebrates the local natural elements (wind and light) using local architectural style and local building materials that can easily be built by the local people.

Before I explain what passive strategies were adopted in the design of the La Lucciola building, let me tell you what passive strategies mean. Passive strategies mean designing a building so that various potentials found in our immediate environment (sun, wind and light) are utilized creatively to reduce the building’s energy loads and increase thermal comfort. It also involves designing passive systems that do not require additional energy to operate.

This is in contrast to active strategies that encompass and emphasize the engineering design of mechanical, electrical and electronic systems and technologies for cooling and lighting.


A high roof/ceiling induces a feeling of great space or spaciousness and provides more ventilation and light. 


This restaurant's open concept and natural materials make its diners feel one with nature. 


Passive design strategies in hot-humid climates like Bali allow daylight but keep the heat from entering the building (by maximizing shading), and allow wind to pass through (maximising natural ventilation). La Lucciola restaurant adopted non-powered passive design solutions such as:
  • shallow plan, open plan 
  • optimum orientation
  • cross-ventilation
  • high roof
  • open walls
  • generous overhangs
  • shaded veranda 
  • surrounding vegetation to shade
By simply allowing the sea breeze to cross-ventilate the whole dining space and providing additional air movement using ceiling fans, these strategies seemed enough to get its diners (who were mostly Western tourists when I was there) to wine and dine for hours while enjoying the breathtaking sea view.

Dining while enjoying the breathtaking view of the sea. 

So, does green architecture depend solely on technology?

My answer is definitely ‘no’. Technology is not the solution to everything.

Why do tourists in Bali love tropical buildings with passive cooling (partly or fully)?


Passive design is a viable option for tropical buildings, which has been demonstrated in many buildings in Bali. In fact, after visiting Bali five times, I come to realize that Bali has successfully proven that any type of building can be made open and naturally ventilated, either partly (termed as ‘mixed-mode’) or fully.

100% naturally ventilated buildings are typically small structures like residential, cafes, restaurants and shops, regardless of whether they are in the urban or rural part of Bali. ‘Mixed-mode’ approach, however, is typically adopted in hotels and resorts, regardless of their size or star rating. What is more interesting is that Bali has mixed-mode shopping malls (e.g. Kuta Beachwalk Shopping Centre) and even airport (Ngurah Rai International Airport)!

Even without much air-conditioning, I realized that these spaces or buildings seem packed with tourists every time I visit Bali.

Why is that so? Let me put it this way.

Unlike local residents, many tourists would be happy to try adjusting to the given climate conditions at their chosen holiday destination. It is not true that the tropical climate is unbearable. It is equally not true that passive architecture cannot cope with the conditions found in the tropics.

Passive climate control will not secure constant low temperatures as powered air-conditioning can do. However, the need for constant temperature which comes with conditioned air, is at least questionable. Adaptation is much healthier than desperate efforts to insulate the building and its occupants from climatic impacts. It is also much healthier and more sustainable.

Another important, if not rather obvious, observation to be made is that tourists go to Bali for leisure. They try to break away from their everyday work, life, and environment. What is the point of a vacation if the time spent in a resort, or a restaurant, is similar to what is left behind?

Part of the holiday excitement is derived from experiencing the tropics, indeed, the tropics as they really are, hot, often humid, and sometimes rainy as well. The provided spaces should make that experience possible at a comfortable level. These needs could and should be utilised in the building plan and design to work with the environment rather than against it.


Should architects employ both passive and active strategies?


Yes, especially for commercial buildings in urban areas where air-conditioning is a must. However, in green architecture, passive strategies should be considered first.

Passive strategies are simpler and cheaper. They greatly reduce the building’s energy loads and increase thermal comfort. They also add indigenous character and a tropical feel to the building and interior spaces.

The use of active technologies or mechanical systems can further reduce energy use and increase thermal comfort. Active technologies should be utilized to increase the effectiveness of passive systems or to make up for the design shortfalls of passive systems.

When both are employed, they increase the environmental effects of building design.

Unfortunately, many environmental problems associated with modern architecture today arise when the active design is totally disconnected from the passive approach. Most of the time, buildings rely on active or mechanical systems and technologies.

The consequence here is poor efficiency. When passive strategies are not part of the design process, mechanical systems need to be bigger, more powerful and more advanced to cool the building efficiently. So these buildings will have much higher initial investments.

Do you agree? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

All images are by the author.

Comments